How to Remove Your Information from Courthouse News Service
Courthouse News covers newly filed lawsuits in near real time with real journalists — and their "opt-out preferences" page is just cookie settings, not an article-removal tool. Here's who to actually contact, and what's realistic either way.
Quick overview
- Courthouse News is a real news wire, staffed by journalists, not an automated aggregator. See how it works.
- Their "opt-out preferences" page is cookies only — it does nothing for article content. See who to contact instead.
- A specific, documented reason matters far more than a general request. See the FAQ.
- Accurate coverage of a genuinely filed lawsuit is exactly what this outlet exists to report, so a request without a specific factual or privacy issue is often declined. What's realistic instead.
What is Courthouse News Service?
Courthouse News Service is a legal news wire staffed by human journalists who cover newly filed civil lawsuits across US courts, often within a day or two of filing. Because coverage is that fast and names the parties directly, a new lawsuit can surface on Courthouse News before it appears almost anywhere else online.
This is genuine reporting, not an automated records feed — which is why removal works more like contacting a newsroom than submitting a data request.
How to remove yourself from Courthouse News Service
Don't waste time on the "opt-out preferences" page — it's worth knowing what it actually does before you rely on it.
- 1
Locate the specific article
Find and copy the exact Courthouse News Service URL covering the case that names you.
- 2
Skip the "opt-out preferences" page
That page only manages cookies and newsletter subscriptions — it does nothing for article content, so don't rely on it.
- 3
Identify the reporter or editor
Check their masthead for the byline or the relevant editorial contact, since a direct, addressed request is more likely to get a response than a general inquiry.
- 4
Send a specific, documented request
Explain the exact factual error, privacy harm, or identity issue — a vague "please remove this" rarely moves for accurate coverage of a real case.
If DIY removal doesn't work
Accurate coverage of a genuinely filed lawsuit is exactly what this outlet exists to report, so a request without a specific factual, privacy, or identity issue behind it is often declined or simply goes unanswered. That reflects how legitimate news outlets generally handle removal requests, not a mistake in how the request was made.
When the story stays published, suppression — building and strengthening content that outranks it for searches on your name — is the realistic next step. Tell us what's showing up and we'll give you an honest read.
Common questions
Is Courthouse News Service legit?
Yes — it's a real news wire staffed by human journalists, covering newly filed civil lawsuits across US courts, often within a day or two of filing. It isn't an automated records aggregator or a data broker, which is exactly why removal works like contacting a newsroom, not submitting a data request.
Does Courthouse News have an opt-out or removal form?
They have an "opt-out preferences" page, but it only covers cookies, ad tracking, and newsletter subscriptions — it has nothing to do with removing an article or a name from their coverage. There is no dedicated removal form either; the realistic path is contacting the reporter or editor on the masthead directly.
How do I actually request an article be corrected or removed?
There's no dedicated removal form. The realistic path is contacting the specific reporter or editor listed on their masthead, or their general inquiries line, with a clear, documented reason — a factual error, privacy harm, or mistaken identity. A direct, addressed request is more likely to get a response than a general one.
Who actually reads Courthouse News Service?
Mostly lawyers and law firms. Founded in 1990 by Bill Girdner, the service counted over 2,200 paying subscribers as of 2020 — overwhelmingly legal professionals, alongside some corporations, nonprofits, and other newsrooms, who pay specifically for faster alerts on new court filings than free public sources provide.
What if the outlet won't correct or remove the story?
Suppression — publishing and strengthening content that outranks the article for searches on your name — becomes the realistic path when the coverage itself stays up. The story doesn't disappear, but it stops being the first thing people find when they search you. Tell us what's showing up and we'll give you an honest read.
Related
Also picked up by a legal trade publication? See our Law360 removal guide, or the full News & Article Removal service.
We know which framing actually gets a response from a newsroom versus which gets ignored — and if a story is going to stand as accurate coverage, we'll say so before you spend time on a request that won't move it.
Start today
See exactly what applies to your case.
Send us the article. We'll tell you honestly whether removal is realistic or whether it needs suppression instead.
Get my confidential assessment